Leftists who go around accusing "Islamophobes" of racism merely stamp the word Dumbass on their own foreheads, making it hard to take anything they say seriously. All it does is advertise that they've never done their homework on Islam, which isn't a race but an ideology that claims to be the absolute truth that applies to all races, demanding total unconditional surrender to it, including its orders to spread a Muslim government over the Earth forever no matter who has to be trampled. It's just the leftists who invent topsy-turvy terms then surrender all reason to them, pushing them on others as debate stoppers. One famous example is "gay". Who can be against people who just want to be gay? ;) Similarly with Islamophobia: Who can be for anybody who is afraid of Islam? Sorry, Islam wants everybody to be afraid of it, because it orders Muslims to inculcate terror in the heart of non-Muslims. Only a leftist can push this Muslim agenda under any label, they must literally hate themselves when they refuse to convert themselves, as if they can play both ends against the middle. The truth is that they fear the masses rising up and using the power of govt. to forcefully expel Muslims from the West, so by limiting their articles to examinations of "Islamophobes" taking the law into their own hands by smearing bacon grease on mosques and other trivialities that they can whip the govt. into overprosecuting, they deflect attention from the solution.
Well, I don't advocate anybody taking the law into their own hands, but I'm proud to be an Islamophobe, and even more, an Islam hater, and will always be, because I both fear and hate Islam's LIES and SICK DEMENTED DOCTRINES, period. Charlie Hebdo is too mild in its satire of this death cult, which should be reviled universally no matter how much oil money they have. The future does not belong to Islam.
My reply:
ReplyDeleteLeftists who go around accusing "Islamophobes" of racism merely stamp the word Dumbass on their own foreheads, making it hard to take anything they say seriously. All it does is advertise that they've never done their homework on Islam, which isn't a race but an ideology that claims to be the absolute truth that applies to all races, demanding total unconditional surrender to it, including its orders to spread a Muslim government over the Earth forever no matter who has to be trampled. It's just the leftists who invent topsy-turvy terms then surrender all reason to them, pushing them on others as debate stoppers. One famous example is "gay". Who can be against people who just want to be gay? ;) Similarly with Islamophobia: Who can be for anybody who is afraid of Islam? Sorry, Islam wants everybody to be afraid of it, because it orders Muslims to inculcate terror in the heart of non-Muslims. Only a leftist can push this Muslim agenda under any label, they must literally hate themselves when they refuse to convert themselves, as if they can play both ends against the middle. The truth is that they fear the masses rising up and using the power of govt. to forcefully expel Muslims from the West, so by limiting their articles to examinations of "Islamophobes" taking the law into their own hands by smearing bacon grease on mosques and other trivialities that they can whip the govt. into overprosecuting, they deflect attention from the solution.
Well, I don't advocate anybody taking the law into their own hands, but I'm proud to be an Islamophobe, and even more, an Islam hater, and will always be, because I both fear and hate Islam's LIES and SICK DEMENTED DOCTRINES, period. Charlie Hebdo is too mild in its satire of this death cult, which should be reviled universally no matter how much oil money they have. The future does not belong to Islam.
http://historyscoper-islamwatch.blogspot.com/2015/01/islamophobia.html